Warringtons-SpeakFreely
    > Local Issues
        > No need for this.
New Topic    New Poll    Add Reply

<< Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
Author
Comment
Bill
Expert Poster
Posts: 1436
(8/12/06 1:42 am)
Reply

No need for this.
This is my reply to the article in this weeks Guardian claiming we didn't ask people.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Dear Sarah.

I’ve just read the report on the hump issue in local life.

I understand you have to show both sides of any argument it’s only right and fair but what Mrs Forber said was quite untrue. We did indeed survey every single home in the effected area. Mrs Forber was however the only person who refused to allow us to deliver our poll and quite literally forced it back on us while a neighbour said “we’ll fight you on this one.” We suspected at the time there might be problems in this immediate area.

Because the council insisted that our second poll included addresses, we were able to build a picture of those for and against on a map. At first sight, Birchdale Road seems just the same as the others with the vast majority rejecting humps, until that is when you get to Mrs Forber. Here we recorded the highest number of consecutive hump votes but more worryingly the highest quantity of consecutive houses where papers were either missing or not returned. Our collection procedure requested residents to leave their returned papers protruding through their letterboxes. There were no returns from nine houses adjacent to Mrs Forber. Make of that what you will but the truth is that if we were to exclude Mrs Forber’s neighbours, there would only be two other people on the whole of Birchdale Road voting for humps.

Mrs Forber said “If you live on Birchdale Road there’s no way that you can be against the speed bumps and that’s why we weren’t approached for the second petition” Sorry Mrs Forber but this just isn’t true is it. Every single house received a questionnaire and our count was 100% accurate. The anomaly surrounding you stands out like a sore thumb and I strongly believe that someone not too far away from you may be attempting to discredit a democratic process, which is utterly deplorable. Who ever attempted this childish and totally predicted deception should be ashamed of them selves. In any case, even if all the missing papers were to have been counted as for bumps you would still be in the minority on Birchdale.

Mrs Forber went on to suggest that I shouldn’t have an opinion and that I’m just anti speed bumps. The only thing that I’m “anti” is making claims that aren’t true and falsifying numbers which is where all this started. The results of the second poll show 82.5% against bumps and this is not just my opinion but the expressed wishes of her neighbours. For the record, I requested speed bumps at my previous address, which was a dangerous road. I have also said many times that I believe speed bumps would be an appropriate solution opposite the school on Seymore Drive. Ironically this is the very road where the largest percentage no vote was returned with just one person wanting bumps with seventeen against.

If there’s any redeeming light in this whole sorry saga it’s the fact that the vast majority of people have been polite and have thanked me for my efforts (including those that wanted bumps). There has been no official response as yet and the traffic committee meeting at the town hall, which I turned up for, was apparently cancelled.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Bill :)

Edited by: Bill at: 9/12/06 12:47 pm
John
Regular Poster
Posts: 183
(8/12/06 2:44 pm)
Reply

Re: The bumps turn nasty.
I suppose Bill that it's a fact of life that there will always be some whose point of view is so entrenched that they are unable to tolerate any others and will actively try to prevent other people putting theirs forward and even resort to the use of misinformation and lies in order to discredit them. A proper democratic process can cope with people like Mrs Forber as the majority view would prevail.

However in our so-called democratic process this is not the case as politicians either appear to listen to the most voiciferous view or even use the same tactics themselves.

Hopefully Bill, you probably don't meet too many of the Mrs Forbers of this world but I expect Councillors see them much more often and I suppose, to some extent, it's understandable that they have a difficult job deciding what the majority view actually is. Maybe your poll will have assisted them in this issue.

<< Prev Topic | Next Topic >>

Add Reply

Email This To a Friend Email This To a Friend
Topic Control Image Topic Commands
Click to receive email notification of replies Click to receive email notification of replies
Click to stop receiving email notification of replies Click to stop receiving email notification of replies
jump to:

- Warringtons-SpeakFreely - Local Issues - Speak-Freely (Main Web Site) -

Powered By ezboard® Ver. 7.32
Copyright ©1999-2007 ezboard, Inc.